Quantcast
Channel: SCN : All Content - All Communities
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 8914

free goods determination

$
0
0

Hello experts,

 

I got some questions. Could you pls share your ideas / experience? Thx.

 

Background:

In my system, the existing access sequence contains 5 tables. It is shared by several regions. Now another new region will use the current tables. Meanwhile, this new region requires to add new tables based on order value.

 

Current tables:

Sales org+Distribution channel+Sold to Party+Material

Sales org+Distribution channel+Customer group+Material

Sales org+Distribution channel+Price list+Material

Sales org+Distribution channel+Price group+Material

Sales org+Distribution channel+Material.

 

New tables could be:

Sales org+Distribution channel+Order value+Sold to Party+Material

Sales org+Distribution channel+Order value+Customer group+Material

Sales org+Distribution channel+Order value+Material.

 

My comments:

Solution 1: If defining new access sequence to group the current tables & new tables, it is not preferred by my group. My group minimize new customizing specific for region because they want to set up a global template.

 

Solution 2: If adding new tables to the existing access sequence, I am afraid there is potential risk of affecting other regions. You know, access sequence is cross-client and sensitive. Especially there is kind of logic overlap between new tables & current tables.

 

My questions:

1. Any other disadvantage if using Solution 2?

2. What is the best option to handle pricing procedure if using Solution 2? I mean, add new condition type to the existing pricing procedure, or create a new pricing procedure?

3.When developing a global template, any key points we should consider for this kind of case? 


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 8914

Trending Articles



<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>